These monkeys surprised scientists by sharing even more when no one was looking

By Melissa Healy April 7  Health and Science – Washington Post

“Marmoset monkeys exist on a branch of the evolutionary tree that is distinct from the one that led to humans. But these fellow primates consistently astonish researchers with social behavior that seems, well, pretty highly evolved.

Marmosets engage in rigorously polite patterns of communication and do not talk over or interrupt each other. Though territorial, they are so inquisitive that they will watch videos of marmosets they do not know and learn from them.

Marmosets’ social organization and offspring-rearing practices could have been the model for the phrase “it takes a village.” A dominant male and female breed, and their babies are ­meticulously looked after by ­extended family members who then aren’t free to breed themselves.

Such seemingly selfless behavior makes the common marmoset a particular puzzle for researchers keen to explain the already-perplexing phenomenon of altruism in humans and a few other higher-order primates.

After all, in stark evolutionary terms, kindness, generosity and self-sacrifice make no sense. When an individual’s survival and the propagation of his genes arguably depend on his hoarding every advantage for himself, why on earth would he forfeit anything to benefit a fellow member of his species?

For marmosets, it’s hard enough to explain the willingness of some family members to delay or forgo breeding to help out with a relative’s offspring. But to share food with those babies when no one’s looking? That just defies all expectations.

In complex societies where individuals band together for mutual protection, researchers have come up with a few widely embraced explanations for altruistic behavior.

Boosting the prospects of a relative’s child — kinship selection — does help propagate at least a few of an individual’s genes, and thus seems a good general explanation for self-sacrificing behavior. But specific acts, such as sharing a delicious cricket with a begging baby marmoset, seem to need more specific explanation.

One possibility is that an individual practices generosity as a means of enhancing his status among peers. By demonstrating that he is so well-endowed with material goods that he can give some away, this do-gooder enhances his prestige within the group. That, in turn, may appeal to prospective mates.

The other explanation for charitable behavior posits that kindnesses extended to others are simply the dues of group membership, which offers some future promise of a chance to mate. Failure to share would result in expulsion from the group and a loss of prospective partners. Scientists call this the “pay to stay” model.

Importantly, for both of these models to work, acts of kindness must have an audience. That suggests you would see more sharing in group settings — away from judging eyes, a caregiver might be more inclined to keep food for himself or herself.

And yet, in 2,581 trials conducted with 31 adult and 14 baby marmosets, the opposite appeared to be true.

Anthropologists from the University of Zurich carefully documented how often, in groups and in conditions that found caregiver and baby separated from the crowd, an adult would share his or her cricket.

When alone with a baby begging for a taste, adult marmosets shared their cricket 85 percent of the time. When in a group, caregivers offered up their cricket 67 percent of the time.

“Our results show that helping in common marmosets is not driven by reputation management or punishment avoidance,” the study authors reported. “Rather, it is driven by an intrinsic motivation to help that is more strongly expressed when individuals are alone with offspring.”

What motivated these acts of kindness? The authors offered a human parallel as a possibility.

“The marmoset pattern of results calls to mind the so-called diffusion of responsibility effect, which is well established in ­humans,” the authors wrote. “People are less likely to help in the presence of a larger number of bystanders, but feel more responsible when alone with a needy individual.”

Whether that pattern fits will require more research, not only in marmosets but with chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys, whose breeding patterns are far less cooperative.”

Photo: Smithsonian Zoo staff

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s